Hedging Bets

Let’s say John McCain gets the nomination. His best bet is probably to get Huckabee as his VP to almost guarantee pulling in the evangelical nomination. If it’s the other way around with Huckabee as president, I would still say the same. Huckabee needs someone with strong foreign policy experience, and just experience in general. [Sorry, but at this point I just can’t see Romney being a viable . . . anything.] McCain is seen as a problem by the republicans. Gee, maybe it’s because when they had the democrats in a tight spot and were about to make a killer deal, he stepped in the middle and fouled it all up. Several times.

For democrats, the ultimate ticket just may be an Obama–Clinton clincher. I say Obama first because he is the visionary, while Billary has the experience and clout on the Hill to line up all the ducks in a filibuster row. They just have to get over their exploded egos and the tension that has built up over the past almost-year.

Of that ticket, the real problem is Billary. Even though she’s got connections, you’re just sure you can’t trust her. She’s like old toothpaste with new packaging; promising fresh and clean, but your intuition tells you there is a real reason why it hasn’t gotten the Dental Association’s seal of approval. Or like pharmaceutical companies; you know they’re scalping you and that you are bound to end up with more negative side effects than the original problem gave you, but you’ve got to take something for your ills.

This is pretty much the best positioning for each party as far as I can tell. And they each need to figure out how to get their side elected. From now until election day, electability is the game.